ST10000NTZ01 vs WD100EFGX

Seagate IronWolf Pro 10TB and Western Digital WD Red Plus 10TB, compared using published manufacturer specifications.

IronWolf Pro 10TB

ST10000NTZ01

SATA 6 Gb/s · 3.5-inch

No verified exact-model Amazon listing yet.

Full specifications & all listings →

WD Red Plus 10TB

WD100EFGX

SATA 6Gb/s · 3.5-inch

Check current Amazon price

Amazon US · New listing ↗

ASIN B0F4R3YCL6

Full specifications & all listings →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Match the selected variant, condition and seller terms before ordering.

What differs between these models?

  • Interface: ST10000NTZ01 lists SATA 6 Gb/s; WD100EFGX lists SATA 6Gb/s.
  • Manufacturer limited warranty: ST10000NTZ01 lists 5 years (eligible new drives); WD100EFGX lists 3 years (eligible new drives).

A larger cache, higher RPM or higher advertised sequential speed alone does not establish which drive is better for your workload.

Specifications side by side

Manufacturer specifications for ST10000NTZ01 and WD100EFGX
SpecificationST10000NTZ01WD100EFGX
ManufacturerSeagateWestern Digital
Product familyIronWolf ProWD Red Plus
Model numberST10000NTZ01WD100EFGX
Capacity (TB)1010
RPM72007200
InterfaceSATA 6 Gb/sSATA 6Gb/s
Form factor3.5-inch3.5-inch
Rotational vibration sensorsYesNot recorded
Manufacturer limited warranty5 years (eligible new drives)3 years (eligible new drives)
NAS baysNot recorded8
RecordingNot recordedCMR
Cache (MB)Not recorded512
Workload rating (TB/year)Not recorded180
Physical sector size (bytes)Not recorded4096
Sustained transfer (up to MB/s)Not recorded260

Compatibility and buying checks

  • Compare new and renewed offers separately. The manufacturer specification does not guarantee the warranty or return policy of a marketplace seller.

Manufacturer sources

ST10000NTZ01

Seagate IronWolf Pro manufacturer specifications ↗

Reviewed 2026-09-07. Published specifications; no independent benchmark or failure-rate claim.

WD100EFGX

Western Digital WD Red Plus manufacturer datasheet ↗

Reviewed 2026-08-21. Published specifications; no independent benchmark or failure-rate claim.

Choose another pair → · Browse the catalog →