ST22000NT001 vs HDWG82CXZSTB

Seagate IronWolf Pro 22TB and Toshiba N300 Pro 22TB, compared using published manufacturer specifications.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Match the selected variant, condition and seller terms before ordering.

What differs between these models?

  • Cache (MB): ST22000NT001 lists 512; HDWG82CXZSTB lists 1024.
  • Average operating power (W): ST22000NT001 lists 7.9; HDWG82CXZSTB lists 7.62.
  • Sustained transfer (up to MB/s): ST22000NT001 lists 285; HDWG82CXZSTB lists 298.

A larger cache, higher RPM or higher advertised sequential speed alone does not establish which drive is better for your workload.

Specifications side by side

Manufacturer specifications for ST22000NT001 and HDWG82CXZSTB
SpecificationST22000NT001HDWG82CXZSTB
ManufacturerSeagateToshiba
Product familyIronWolf ProN300 Pro
Model numberST22000NT001HDWG82CXZSTB
Capacity (TB)2222
RPM72007200
InterfaceSATA 6 Gb/sSATA 6 Gb/s
RecordingCMRCMR
Cache (MB)5121024
Form factor3.5-inch3.5-inch
Power-on hours per year8760Not recorded
Workload rating (TB/year)550550
Average operating power (W)7.97.62
Rotational vibration sensorsYesYes
Manufacturer limited warranty5 years (eligible new drives)5 years (eligible new drives)
Sustained transfer (up to MB/s)285298
NAS baysNot recorded24
Sector formatNot recorded512e
Idle power (W)Not recorded4.35
Package / regionNot recordedUS retail; manufacturer-documented bulk package alias

Compatibility and buying checks

  • Check sector-format support in the controller and operating system, particularly for native 4K (4Kn) variants.
  • Compare new and renewed offers separately. The manufacturer specification does not guarantee the warranty or return policy of a marketplace seller.

Manufacturer sources

ST22000NT001

Seagate IronWolf Pro manufacturer specifications ↗ · pages 2

Reviewed 2026-09-07. Published specifications; no independent benchmark or failure-rate claim.

HDWG82CXZSTB

Toshiba N300 Pro US datasheet TAEC-2839-R2.0, July 2026 ↗ · pages 3, 7

Reviewed 2026-09-08. Published specifications; no independent benchmark or failure-rate claim.

Choose another pair → · Browse the catalog →